Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Life is Short, Readers are Waiting

A Case for Self-Publishing

by Christopher Noël




        You hold in your hands a completed manuscript which deserves to connect with its readership. Two divergent paths to this goal lie before you: the path of traditional publishing and the path of independent publishing—also known as self-publishing.
        The first path promises prestige and, potentially, a cash advance…if you can find an agent who loves your book, if she can find an editor who loves your book, and if that editor can convince others at the publishing house—especially the sales force—that your book will make money, or that the company can absorb a loss for the sake of art. This path to publication usually takes years between agent search and first printed copy arriving in the mail. Meanwhile, the clock ticks and you get older and older.
      The second path lying before you offers a quick trip: copies of your book will reach readers in a few weeks and you can move forward with your life. Of course, the trade-off is that in this scenario you are genuinely independent, in ways both good and bad. The downside is that you renounce that heady prestige, as well as the robust distribution and marketing machine of a publishing house, and you must grapple instead with the lingering stigma that comes with self-publishing, with going it alone and sending your work out into the world without the stamp of approval conferred by the legacy publishing industry.
      So let’s look at this stigma, element by element.
1.      It stems in part from the notion that writers are paying to have their own books printed. This reputation is a hold-over from the “vanity press” days of yore, the analog days, whereas we now live in the digital age; therefore—and here I use the example I favor, a platform called CreateSpace—you pay nothing, either up front or down the road, as long as you handle the print-ready formatting of the manuscript yourself and provide your own cover art.
2.      Conservative detractors seem to think that a gate-keeper must stand between artist and audience, ensuring the worthiness of the former. Well, hot news flash: artists and writers have been chipping away at and transcending this middle man for many years now. Think of the music industry, where bands and solo performers have been successfully shunning and sidestepping conventional industry labels for more than a decade, releasing their work directly to their fans by means of “independent labels”—that is, their own labels. Take the example of bloggers, too. What are they but self-publishers? Fifteen years ago, those in the know looked down their noses at these poor creatures who apparently could not get their work accepted within “legitimate” journalistic venues. But don’t look now—bloggers virtually rule the world. Those who release their own books independently are the bloggers of the book-publishing world. And YouTube allows countless artists, entertainers, and journalists to connect directly with their various audiences. Commentator Cenk Uygur, for instance, left the world of corporate news at MSNBC to found his own outlet, The Young Turks, which has now amassed two and a half billion YouTube views, even as MSNBC continues to languish in ratings purgatory.
3.      The stigma against independent publishing suffers from a severe, ahistorical blind spot—or is it a willful forgetting of the past? I recognize that this point will seem to clash with the above image of the current-day reactionaries having “fallen behind the curve of history,” but the truth is that both dynamics are in play: contemporary options are outstripping the corporate modalities of recent years and our new groundswell of authorial autonomy resonates with that of a century ago and more. Before the publishing industry had developed and consolidated power, authors who could afford to (yes, it cost money back then) often had their own works printed up and made available to readers—geniuses including Virginia Woolf, Walt Whitman, Gertrude Stein, Edgar Allen Poe, Mark Twain, Henry David Thoreau, Beatrix Potter, and a multitude of other enduring literary figures. That is, we are now circling back to a time when authors felt at liberty to make and distribute books without stigma.

       The only trouble is that many in the world of traditional publishing (and in the ancillary ranks of bookstores and reviewers) have fallen behind the curve of history and still cling to that outmoded and regressive “gate-keeper” archetype. Why not let art sink or swim thanks to its intrinsic quality rather than to the imprimatur of a company? When you boil the case down, after all, what is an editor? An editor is an English major who got a job. And marketers? They are not even English majors.
     Fortunately, today’s dramatic reboot of Virginia Woolf’s operating system enjoys a fresh digital form, a form far more nimble and writer-friendly than any that has ever existed before. Here are three enormous advantages of the system we now find at our easy disposal:

1.    If one wishes to add or subtract material or to remove typos, one can simply rework and upload the book’s interior file, which will then go “live” within hours. Compare this to the past; who among us has not cringed at glaring mistakes in conventionally published books, glitches that were not and will never be fixed because of the prohibitive expense of doing so within the old regime?  In short, in the new regime, you retain open-ended control over your work. 
2.    Kissing the middle man good-bye gives us royalties that are much more generous; CreateSpace, for instance, pays the writer an average 33% of the list price, as opposed to the typical 7.5%-12% still paid by publishing houses. Over the past two months, my titles have earned me less than a thousand dollars—a modest amount for sure, but these payments will keep accruing year after year after year, as will readership.
3.    That’s because such books will never go out of print. Never. The method used to produce books is called print-on-demand, which means that copies are printed only as orders come in. No more inventories backlogged and moldering in warehouses, only to be shredded once the title falls out of print in order to make room for succeeding crates. Since it costs today’s digital platforms nothing to keep authors’ files active as ebooks and ready to be transformed into shiny paperbacks at a moment’s notice, there exists zero pressure for any book to become unavailable. I remember that when I published books with Knopf and Random House, in the 1980s and 1990s, their “shelf life” seemed to last just about as long as my meager advance money.

      One important caveat, however. This completed manuscript you hold in your hands? It better be “completed” indeed, because before you decide to forge ahead and release it to the world, you are your own excellent gate-keeper—you and your circle of trusted advisors. Yes, the digital revolution allows us to fix errors post-publication, but don’t forget that smart readers will have caught them before you did and will have judged your writing accordingly. Make sure the book is definitely good enough before hitting UPLOAD.
     A friend of mine worked on a novel for ten years, until it was more than good enough; I can attest to that. For the next five years, she endured the endless rounds of agents who “loved the book” and editors who “loved the book” but were not quite able to “raise the passion in-house” to put it over the top. Finally, my friend had to give up on the traditional route.
     That was in 2005. I wish I could report that she then set proudly forth on the route to self-empowerment and that her beautiful novel has lived and breathed in the world for the past decade. Instead, held hostage by convention, she kept it in the dark, where it remains today. Though they will never know it, thousands of readers are much the poorer for her decision.
     

Christopher Noël’s two most recent books, which he released the instant they were ready, are The Girl who Spoke with Giants (a novel) and The Mind of Sasquatch and the Secret to Their Success (a theory).  He is also a freelance editor:  www.ChristopherNoel.Info





         

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Top Seven Reasons to Self-Publish



When Selby ink was founded 17 years ago publishing a book followed a routine process: You started by calling agents and editors who most likely told you to send them a query letter. Next step was usually a book proposal (if they were interested), plus a few sample chapters. Then the waiting game started, usually ending with disappointment. On the other hand, the option to self-publish was there, but it had a certain stigma…like your book wasn’t good enough for a “real publisher”. And eBooks were unknown!

When we see the sales figures for a self-published book like Still Alice we realize that times have changed. Today self-publishing is not only popular, but often it’s the preferred publishing path of many respected authors. As long as your book is professionally produced, with an eye-catching cover and compelling content, you can directly compete with any bestselling author.
Thinking about publishing your book soon? Here are my seven best reasons to self-publish your book:

1. Timing: Traditional publishers work on a long production cycle, they often plan a year to a year and a half—or even longer—to get a book out. As a self-publisher you can do it in a fraction of that time. It’s your material, your career move - you can take control of when you want to publish.

2. You Just Might Strike It Rich: Self-publishing offers the potential for huge profits. No longer do you have to be satisfied with the meager 5 to 15 percent royalty that commercial publishers dole out. When you use creativity, persistence, and sound business sense, money is there to be made. Most publishers require their authors to do their own promotion, why not self-publish and earn a 40 – 400% margin? If your book becomes a hit, publishers will come calling and give you the upper hand in negotiations.

Even without being a huge hit self-published authors can create a springboard to traditional publishing. As publicists we have helped many of our authors get their book published by traditional publishers. Once the marketability of your book has been proven, they may be eager to take it off your hands.

3. Ownership: Self-publishing can be the road to your independence. Do you dream of being your own boss? Do you desire more personal freedom? You can turn that dream into reality. Here is a dynamic, proven way to shape your own destiny. It is an answer not only for city folks but also for urban escapees seeking to prosper in paradise.

As a self-publisher, you own all rights to your book, whereas a traditional publisher would likely own the rights. If they lose interest in your book, you cannot print additional copies unless you purchase those rights back. Traditional publishers often require you to purchase your book from them to do any promotion you choose to do for your book. As your own publisher you print as many books as you need.

4. Niche: Traditional publishers may not take an interest in your book if it is topic-specific. They may feel the demand is not great enough to warrant a large press run. However, your book may fill a niche that has not been met, and you can “test the waters” with short-run printing.

5. Locality: Books about local or regional topics are generally produced by local authors in short-run quantities. Large publishers may decline publishing these books because of their limited sales potential.

6. Control: Self-publishing gives you the final say on the direction of your book. Your book reflects your vision and not someone else's. You can personally guide every step, or hire professionals to be on your team. You can choose the cover you like, the typeface, and the title you want. You maintain absolute control over your own book.

7. Legacy: And last but not least - sharing what you have learned, building your career, or leaving a family legacy are admirable motives.
Today when you self-publish you can create your own publishing company that provides you with a tax shelter, and a way to establish your material in a more professional manner. You are never stuck doing “it” all alone. There are great professionals to guide you, and dozens of “how-to” books to educate you in the process of publishing your own book. With all of these reasons to self-publish what is stopping you now? Will 2015 be a very good year to make your mark with your own book?

Mari Selby founded Selby ink in 1998 after working for a small publisher where she was successful in improving their sales from 20,000 books to over 100,000 books in one year. Prior to being a publicist Mari was a family therapist in private practice for almost 20 years.  http://www.selbyink.com

© July, 2015 Mari Selby


Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Why your self published book isn't getting reviews

PUTTING YOUR BEST FOOT FORWARD
How do we put this delicately?... 

--We have nothing against self published or small press publications.  Unfortunately though, there are a number of the aforementioned who are giving the rest of you a bad name.

When you submit your book for an award or for review, it goes without saying that you need to put your best foot forward.  That means, first and foremost, no typographical errors.  Sadly, we review a great number of books which are simply fabulous . . . with one exception.  - Too many typographical or grammatical errors. 

Hey, we’re all human.  Even the best known publishing houses occasionally let a typo or two slip.  - But when you’re talking a significant number of typos, well that’s just not something we can overlook.

We are in the business of helping put readers in touch with excellence in literature.  We’re also in the business of helping you, as an author, gain recognition for your work.  We do this by offering free reviews and through our Literary Classics Seal of Approval and Awards programs.

But in order to offer free reviews, we must use our time efficiently.  Therefore, when we consider a book for review, we will continue reading your book as long as we can, before we discover too many typographical or grammatical errors.  You may ask: ‘how many is too many?’  Well the short answer is - one!  Your book should be in top-notch shape.  Occasionally, if we are ‘wowed’ by a book, we may choose to ignore the first error.  But you don’t want to push your luck.  In fairness to our readers who are trusting us to identify the best books based upon our recommendations, we cannot, in good faith, recommend a book which is riddled with errors. 

Another area of weakness which we see all too often is a poorly developed story.  One of the greatest challenges an author faces, is the difficulty of translating his/her thoughts onto paper.  What may be glaringly obvious to you, may not be so clear to the reader.  Unfortunately, if a book is lacking in plot, or motivation, or is simply too hard to follow, your reader will most likely lose interest.

It is our recommendation that before your book is ever submitted to a publisher, you have a professional critique and a professional edit performed of your manuscript (in that order) from a credible source. 

Article re-posted with permission from Literary Classics Book Awards and Reviewswww.clcawards.org

Friday, March 20, 2015

To Self Publish or Not to Self Publish . . . that is the question

Self-publishing is the publication of any book or eBook by the author of that work without the involvement of a third-party publisher. The author is responsible for, and in control of, the design, formatting, pricing, distribution and marketing. As a self publisher an author may choose to take on all the aforementioned tasks, or outsource all or some of the process to companies which offer these services.

Self Publishing is nothing new.  The concept of self publishing has actually been around for hundreds of years.  But recent technological advancements have had an incredible impact on publishing, and self publishing in particular.  In 2008, for the first time in history, more books were self-published than those published traditionally. In 2009, 76% of all books released were self-published, while publishing houses actually reduced the number of books they produced

Some authors choose to publish because they can gain more control over their published work.  Others self publish because they feel there is greater financial opportunity when cutting out the middle man.  Still others self publish because their work was rejected by traditional publishers (the late, great Dr. Seuss was rejected twenty-four times before finding a publisher willing to publish his work).  Regardless the reason, it appears self publishing is gaining momentum and garnering some amount of respect in the publishing world. A growing number of well known and highly respected authors are even beginning to jump on the self publishing bandwagon. 

This blog has been created to explore the options of traditional publishing vs. self publishing.  We'll share the good, the bad and the ugly where both sides are concerned.  - If you have a story you'd like to share about your publishing experience, we'd love to hear from you.